مكافحة | الموقت الأدوات !
اضغط الزر نسخ ولصق في بلوق الخاص بك أو الموقع.
(يرجى الانتقال إلى وضع أتش تي أم أل عند نشر في بلوق الخاص بك. أمثلة : ورد مثال, مثال مدون)
Moral Responsibility and the Principle of Alternative Possibilities Principle of Alternative Possibilities (PAP): a person is morally responsible for what she has done only if she could have done otherwise Although its precise form and interpretation have varied, this principle has enjoyed broad support in the history of philosophy
The Principle of Alternative Possibilities Explained The Principle of Alternative Possibilities (PAP) is a cornerstone in the philosophical debate surrounding free will and moral responsibility At its core, PAP posits that an individual is morally responsible for their actions only if they could have done otherwise
Ethics Handout 24 Harry Frankfurt, Alternate Possibilities and Moral . . . The Principle of Alternate Possibilities (PAP): A person is morally responsible for her act only if she could have done otherwise than she does Why should we be tempted to accept PAP in the first place? It, or rather, part of it, seems to be entailed by the Ought Implies Can Principle”
The Principle of Alternate Possibilities as Sufficient but not . . . Harry Frankfurt describes the principle of alternate possibilities (PAP) as follows: “A person is morally responsible for what he has done only if he could have done otherwise” (Frankfurt 1969, p 829; emphasis added)
Frankfurt Cases - The Principle of Alternate Possibilities In 1961, Harry Frankfurt famously defined what he called "The Principle of Alternate Possibilities" or PAP "a person is morally responsible for what he has done only if he could have done otherwise ”
The Principle of Alternate Possibilities - JSTOR 1 Harry Frankfurt, 'Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility,' Journal of Philosophy 66 (1969) 829-39 The literature which discusses Frankfurt's attack on PAP includes the following: David Blumenfeld, 'The Principle of Alternate
The Principle of Alternate Possibilities | Canadian Journal of . . . While premise two has been the focus of an enormous amount of controversy, premise one until recently has remained virtually unchallenged However, since Harry Frankfurt’s provocative paper in 1969, premise one, which he dubbed the principle of alternate possibilities (henceforth referred to as PAP), has begun to attract its share of the debate
Revising the Principle of Alternate Possibilities - PhilArchive This paper examines the position in moral philosophy that Harry Frankfurt calls the Principle of Alternate Possibilities (PAP) The paper first describes the principle as articulated by A J Ayer
Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility This is the Principle of Alternate Possibilities (PAP): for any person and any action, that person is morally responsible for performing or failing to perform that action only if she had a genuine alternate possibility open to her at the time
The Principle of Alternate Possibilities - PhilPapers However, since Harry Frankfurt’s provocative paper in 1969, premise one, which he dubbed the principle of alternate possibilities, has begun to attract its share of the debate
